| Digital Transformation and AI Adaptation |
GPSC has integrated digital technology and Artificial Intelligence into core business, including production control, energy analytics, and strategic decision-making. The rapid advancement of AI—particularly Generative AI and Large Language Models—has introduced a new class of external risks that are unprecedented and not yet fully understood: AI-generated misinformation and disinformation that can distort operational decisions, adversarial manipulation of AI systems (data poisoning), and cyber threats targeting AI-integrated infrastructure. These risks differ from conventional IT risks they arise from the probabilistic and autonomous nature of AI systems. GPSC is in the early stages of building the governance, skills, and infrastructure required to manage these risks while their long-term impact on operational resilience, cybersecurity, decision-making reliability, and competitive position remains uncertain as AI adoption and regulatory expectations continue to evolve |
- Cyber threats targeting AI-integrated systems and digital infrastructure—including attacks on machine learning pipelines and OT-connected platforms—represent a new and expanding attack surface beyond conventional IT security, potentially causing system outages, data breaches, and reputational and financial damage.
- AI-generated misinformation, disinformation, and data integrity failures from adversarial manipulation can directly compromise GPSC's production control decisions, energy forecasting accuracy, and analytical systems—leading to operational disruptions that are difficult to detect and attribute.
- The rapid pace of AI adoption creates a workforce competency gap in AI model governance, data analytics, and digital system integration, risking slower technology implementation, reduced innovation capacity, and growing dependency on external vendors with limited internal oversight.
|
- Prevent data leakage and strengthen cybersecurity through system design and testing, two-factor authentication, regular software updates, and prudent personal data management under oversight of the Board, management, and responsible functions.
- Formulate and execute a long-term digital and AI roadmap compatible with GPSC's business context, including governance structures for AI model management, and build a digital & AI culture across GPSC Group to sustain capability in managing AI-related risks and opportunities.
- Conduct routine phishing awareness programs and cybersecurity training for all personnel to build organizational resilience against social engineering and AI-enabled cyber threats, in compliance with GPSC's IT policies.
- Develop upskilling and reskilling programs in AI, data analytics, and digital system integration to address workforce competency gaps and reduce dependency on external vendors.
|
| Geopolitical Security Risk |
The escalating intensity of external risk derived from the international conflicts, together with the increasing geopolitical fragmentation through trade restrictions, sanctions, and regional realignment of global supply chains, has intensified geoeconomic uncertainty, energy security, and supply chain disruptions. These are increasing the volatility of fuel and energy prices, resulting inflationary pressures, higher transport and manufacturing costs, and global economic slowdown, creating long-term challenges for businesses to anticipate and manage emerging risks. These uncertain risks create long-term challenges in anticipating and managing emerging risks across GPSC, its customers, and stakeholders. For GPSC, risks may significantly affect fuel procurement, project investment costs, and electricity demand, requiring GPSC to strengthen energy security, diversify fuel and supplier portfolios, enhance supply chain resilience, and accelerate renewable and low-carbon energy investment |
- Impacts on energy and fuel stability, security, and price volatility of fuels, including natural gas and coal of GPSC’s business and feedstock/ raw material of customer/ supplier that resulted to return on business operation, power production and financial margins performance
- Increase of supply chain impact from the surge of transportation, manufacturing & raw materials cost and supply shortage leads to the company business interruption
- Decrease in customer demand and power consumption
- The acceleration of energy transition into green and clean sources of energy for more self-resilience, compared to the dependency of conventional energy which may rely on imported fuel from external.
|
- In short-term manage to maximize asset utilization and operate the business with optimum & reliable risk and opportunities to reducing uncertainty impact.
- Seek investment opportunities in renewable energy supply chains and diversify portfolio of customers to support long-term business expansion and minimize risk of customer concentration in term of type and area.
- Pursue investment opportunities to study and develop New S-Curve low-carbon technologies—SMR, hydrogen, ammonia, and CCS—to sustain long-term business growth beyond the present core power generation business and decarbonize GPSC Group and its customers in long term.
- Study, develop, and drive the use of low-carbon fuels for power generation—including ammonia and hydrogen co-firing and SMR development—alongside CCS to stay prepared for GHG limitations and foster GPSC's emerging business opportunities.
- Seek opportunities to secure sources of energy to decrease impact of supply chain volatility i.e. LNG shipper/importer
|
| Economic Recession and Trade War Barrier |
International conflicts, geopolitical tensions, economic slowdowns, and expanding tariff and non-tariff barriers have evolved into increasingly interconnected and complex risks. These developments are reshaping global trade flows, industrial investment patterns, energy supply chains, and capital markets. While their impacts on GPSC are currently manageable, prolonged disruptions could significantly affect fuel procurement, industrial electricity demand, overseas investments, and long-term business growth, requiring continuous adaptation of the Company's strategy and risk management approach. |
- Increased volatility in energy security and fuel procurement costs.
- Higher financing costs and capital allocation uncertainty arising from inflationary pressures and fragile international capital markets.
- Changes in industrial production and export activities resulting from tariff and non-tariff barriers, potentially reducing electricity and steam demand from industrial customers.
- Geopolitical developments affecting overseas investment execution, business partnerships, and long-term growth opportunities
|
- Managing the impact on business performance through fuel price formulas used in electricity production and distribution contracts, along with plant optimization operations, production, and distribution improvements, and coordination with relevant external agencies.
- Coordinating cooperation between customers/partners to maintain production and electricity delivery stability.
- Risk management and impact mitigation through the Raw Material Price and Financial Hedging Committee, as well as monitoring interest rate situations and financial costs to find suitable financial instruments.
- Managing risks and impacts from investment project selection, short and long-term evaluation, business partnership establishment, in-depth business environment study through GPSC personnel in the area, and considering Exit Strategy in appropriate situations.
|
| Climate Regulation and Climate Action |
As international commitments, including those by Thailand, aim to address the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, with Thailand setting a target to reduce emissions by 40% by the year 2030, it poses conditions affecting the current operations and business of GPSC. This necessitates seeking ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions under the management of production from stable fossil fuels, essential for electricity generation to support industrial usage. This includes financial management and cost from policies supporting investments in clean fuel businesses, alongside maintaining business performance to respond to shareholders and stakeholders. |
- Measures to prevent trade barriers through taxes and additional expenses in products with higher greenhouse gas emissions than specified levels, affecting both customers and possibly leading to reduced product purchases and increased expenses for GPSC.
|
- Accelerating production efficiency, energy fuel usage, investing in renewable energy, developing new business models for clean energy procurement, and certification of clean energy emissions.
- Studying and developing new energy utilization technologies with low greenhouse gas emissions.
- Exploring technologies for carbon capture and storage.
|
| New Technology / Energy Advancement Risk |
The energy sector plays a vital role in the transition toward a low-carbon economy and sustainability. Conventional energy is being phased out and replaced by new advancements in energy technology. The accelerating pace of new energy, including solid-state batteries, SMR, H2–based energy, ammonia, and CCUS, poses a new and significant risk to the global energy sector including GPSC. These technologies have the potential to reshape the energy landscape, driving the transition from traditional centralized utilities to micro-decentralized, self-optimizing energy ecosystems. For GPSC, this could result in long-term shifts in the market and changes in customer expectations. This risk is still emerging as these technologies are in the early stages of development, and their impacts are yet to be fully realized. GPSC is preparing its business model called “S-Curve” to ensure the ability to adapt on these changes as a new pathway and integrate new energy solutions into its operations If GPSC delays implementing its S-Curve strategy and new energy solutions, the company may face penalties, fines, and rising compliance costs (e.g., carbon taxes) as stricter GHG emissions and sustainability regulations take effect. Failure to adapt could also expose the company to legal risks and greater financial pressures. |
- GPSC risks losing its market position if it fails to adapt to the shift toward new energy advancements. As competitors embrace emerging technologies and decentralization continues to disrupt traditional utility-based business models, GPSC could lose its competitive edge, leading to declining revenue and market share as customers increasingly demand more flexible, efficient, and sustainable solutions. To remain competitive, GPSC must proactively embrace platform-based, service-oriented, and data-driven approaches that align with evolving market expectations and sustainability goals.
- If GPSC delays implementing its S-Curve strategy and new energy solutions, the company may face penalties, fines, and rising compliance costs (e.g., carbon taxes) as stricter GHG emissions and sustainability regulations take effect. Failure to adapt could also expose the company to legal risks and greater financial pressures.
|
- Develop next-generation technologies such as solid-state batteries, hydrogen-based solutions, ammonia, CCUS, and nuclear microreactors (e.g., SMR), and secure strategic partnerships to accelerate integration and maintain competitiveness.
- Evolve GPSC’s business model under S3 and S4 Strategies to be service-oriented and data-centric, integrating flexible energy solutions such as energy decentralization that combine renewable generation and energy storage for optimized, on-demand supply.
- Govern the study to long-term R&D in emerging energy technologies and invest in infrastructure for decentralized energy systems to ensure GPSC is well-positioned for future energy solutions.
- Collaborate with energy innovators and tech companies to adopt new technologies, reducing financial burdens while staying ahead in the evolving energy market.
- Engage with related government authorities to support the relevant policy/ regulation/ to push forward new technologies to implementation phase.
|